WallStSmart

Ferrovial SE (FER)vsGreat Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 984% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $888.28M). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 8.3%. GLDD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.27. GLDD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0

GLDD

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.46
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

GLDDSignificantly Overvalued (-16.7%)

Margin of Safety

-16.7%

Fair Value

$14.53

Current Price

$17.00

$2.47 premium

UndervaluedFair: $14.53Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

GLDD3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.5%8/10

Revenue surging 26.5% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.492/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
47.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

GLDD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.14B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-37.9%2/10

Earnings declined 37.9%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.462/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : GLDD

The strongest argument for GLDD centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.27 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 47.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : GLDD

The primary concerns for GLDD are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FER profiles as a value stock while GLDD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GLDD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.37 — expect wider price swings.

GLDD is growing revenue faster at 26.5% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GLDD scores higher overall (60/100 vs 38/100) and 26.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation provides dredging services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?