Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$188.70
-0.92%
ENERGY · Cap: $53.58B
WPP
WPP PLC ADR
$18.97
+1.12%
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · Cap: $4.05B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 7% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $13.55B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -1.6%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
WPP
Avoid32
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+44.7%
Fair Value
$305.77
Current Price
$188.70
$117.07 discount
Margin of Safety
+75.6%
Fair Value
$75.12
Current Price
$18.97
$56.15 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Generating 1.7B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Operating margin of 2.2%
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : WPP
The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : WPP
The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
WPP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.
WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 32/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 75.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
WPP PLC ADR
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA
WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?