WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsWheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 518% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $2.31B). WPM leads profitability with a 63.6% profit margin vs 11.6%. WPM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.43. WPM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

WPM

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 9.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
WPMUndervalued (+1.4%)

Margin of Safety

+1.4%

Fair Value

$151.16

Current Price

$122.64

$28.52 discount

UndervaluedFair: $151.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

WPM5 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Profit MarginProfitability
63.6%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
75.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 75.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
127.2%10/10

Revenue surging 127.2% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$54.92B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WPM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : WPM

The strongest argument for WPM centers on PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.6% and operating margin at 75.2%. Revenue growth of 127.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WPM

The primary concerns for WPM are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while WPM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WPM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

WPM is growing revenue faster at 127.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WPM scores higher overall (76/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 63.6% margins and 127.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · GOLD · USA

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?