WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsVista Oil Gas ADR (VIST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 398% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $2.90B). VIST leads profitability with a 25.7% profit margin vs 2.0%. VIST trades at a lower P/E of 10.5x. VIST earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

VIST

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 9.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued
VISTSignificantly Overvalued (-35.5%)

Margin of Safety

-35.5%

Fair Value

$41.35

Current Price

$74.42

$33.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $41.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

VIST5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
97.3%10/10

Revenue surging 97.3% year-over-year

Return on EquityProfitability
28.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
25.7%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
24.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.9%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

VIST4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.594/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.453/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-252.57M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : VIST

The strongest argument for VIST centers on P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.7% and operating margin at 24.9%. Revenue growth of 97.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : VIST

The primary concerns for VIST are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while VIST is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

VIST is growing revenue faster at 97.3% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VIST scores higher overall (68/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 25.7% margins and 97.3% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Vista Oil Gas ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Vista Oil & Gas, SAB de CV, is dedicated to the exploration and production of oil and gas in Latin America. The company is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?