WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Universal Health Services Inc generates 21% more annual revenue ($17.36B vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 8.6%. UHS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. UHS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

UHS

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
UHSUndervalued (+78.6%)

Margin of Safety

+78.6%

Fair Value

$1081.08

Current Price

$186.72

$894.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1081.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

UHS4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
21.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
42.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 42.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UHS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

UHS is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UHS scores higher overall (76/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?