WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsUBS Group AG (UBS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

UBS Group AG generates 255% more annual revenue ($51.31B vs $14.47B). UBS leads profitability with a 17.8% profit margin vs 2.0%. UBS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.53. UBS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

UBS

Strong Buy

79

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UBS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

UBS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
84.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 84.4% YoY

Market CapQuality
$148.26B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.538/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UBS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : UBS

The strongest argument for UBS centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.8% and operating margin at 31.5%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UBS

No major red flags identified for UBS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while UBS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.83 — expect wider price swings.

UBS is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UBS scores higher overall (79/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 17.8% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

UBS Group AG

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

UBS Group AG, provides advice and financial solutions to private, institutional and corporate clients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?