WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsUBS Group AG (UBS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

UBS Group AG generates 247% more annual revenue ($49.60B vs $14.29B). UBS leads profitability with a 15.7% profit margin vs 11.6%. UBS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.44. UBS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

UBS

Strong Buy

77

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
UBSUndervalued (+61.2%)

Margin of Safety

+61.2%

Fair Value

$109.04

Current Price

$38.10

$70.94 discount

UndervaluedFair: $109.04Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

UBS6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
54.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 54.6%

EPS GrowthGrowth
58.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$116.88B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UBS1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$-11.34B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UBS

The strongest argument for UBS centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.7% and operating margin at 54.6%. Revenue growth of 12.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UBS

The primary concerns for UBS are Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while UBS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.

UBS is growing revenue faster at 12.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBS scores higher overall (77/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 15.7% margins and 12.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

UBS Group AG

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

UBS Group AG, provides advice and financial solutions to private, institutional and corporate clients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?