Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTrade Desk Inc (TTD)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$188.70
-0.92%
ENERGY · Cap: $53.58B
TTD
Trade Desk Inc
$23.08
-1.75%
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · Cap: $11.18B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 400% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $2.90B). TTD leads profitability with a 15.3% profit margin vs 2.0%. TTD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.92. TTD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
TTD
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+44.7%
Fair Value
$305.77
Current Price
$188.70
$117.07 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for TTD.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Moderate valuation
Grey zone — moderate risk
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : TTD
The strongest argument for TTD centers on Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.3% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : TTD
The primary concerns for TTD are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a value stock while TTD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
TTD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.10 — expect wider price swings.
TTD is growing revenue faster at 14.3% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TTD scores higher overall (72/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 15.3% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Trade Desk Inc
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA
Trade Desk, Inc. is a technology company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ventura, California.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?