WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsToyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 348461% more annual revenue ($50.45T vs $14.47B). TM leads profitability with a 7.3% profit margin vs 2.0%. TM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.54. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TM

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

TM3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$230.96B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
10.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$592.05B10/10

Generating 592.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
16.0x4/10

Trading at 16.0x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-42.3%2/10

Earnings declined 42.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

TM generates stronger free cash flow (592.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (55/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?