WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 58% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $9.14B). STZ leads profitability with a 18.5% profit margin vs 2.0%. STZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.74. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

STZ

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$305.11

Current Price

$188.70

$116.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.11Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for STZ.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

STZ3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
26.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.7%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Revenue declined 11.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 26.7%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

STZ scores higher overall (56/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 18.5% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?