WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 52% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $9.38B). STZ leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 11.6%. STZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 5.46. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

STZ

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.61
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
STZSignificantly Overvalued (-276.7%)

Margin of Safety

-276.7%

Fair Value

$43.32

Current Price

$151.56

$108.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

STZ1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.9%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.614/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
5.462/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.8%2/10

Revenue declined 9.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at -9.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

STZ scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?