WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMurphy Oil Corporation (MUR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 431% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $2.69B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 3.9%. MUR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.33. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

MUR

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
MURSignificantly Overvalued (-598.8%)

Margin of Safety

-598.8%

Fair Value

$4.90

Current Price

$39.97

$35.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4.90Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

MUR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MUR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
2.6%3/10

ROE of 2.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

3.9% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
53.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.4%2/10

Revenue declined 8.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MUR

The strongest argument for MUR centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MUR

The primary concerns for MUR are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 53.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while MUR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MUR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

MUR is growing revenue faster at -8.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (45/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Murphy Oil Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Murphy Oil Corporation is an oil and natural gas exploration and production company in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?