WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLowe's Companies Inc (LOW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lowe's Companies Inc generates 496% more annual revenue ($86.29B vs $14.47B). LOW leads profitability with a 7.7% profit margin vs 2.0%. LOW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.40. LOW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

LOW

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.16
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$305.11

Current Price

$188.70

$116.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.11Overvalued
LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-36.3%)

Margin of Safety

-36.3%

Fair Value

$168.18

Current Price

$229.20

$61.02 premium

UndervaluedFair: $168.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

LOW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$129.31B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.404/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.7%3/10

7.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LOW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.90 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 10.9% — sustainability is the question.

LOW generates stronger free cash flow (964M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LOW scores higher overall (44/100 vs 41/100) and 10.9% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?