WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLowe's Companies Inc (LOW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lowe's Companies Inc generates 504% more annual revenue ($86.29B vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 7.7%. LOW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.40. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

LOW

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.16
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-193.3%)

Margin of Safety

-193.3%

Fair Value

$80.51

Current Price

$236.18

$155.67 premium

UndervaluedFair: $80.51Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

LOW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$131.50B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.404/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.7%3/10

7.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.8%2/10

Earnings declined 10.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while LOW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LOW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 10.9% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (45/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?