WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLithia Motors Inc (LAD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lithia Motors Inc generates 161% more annual revenue ($37.73B vs $14.47B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs 1.9%. LAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. LAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

LAD

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 9.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$305.11

Current Price

$188.70

$116.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.11Overvalued
LADUndervalued (+53.9%)

Margin of Safety

+53.9%

Fair Value

$694.31

Current Price

$293.99

$400.32 discount

UndervaluedFair: $694.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

LAD3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.0%4/10

1.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : LAD

The strongest argument for LAD centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LAD

The primary concerns for LAD are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LAD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.28 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LAD scores higher overall (55/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Lithia Motors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Lithia Motors, Inc. is an automobile retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Medford, Oregon.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?