WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsKinder Morgan Inc (KMI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kinder Morgan Inc generates 18% more annual revenue ($16.94B vs $14.29B). KMI leads profitability with a 18.0% profit margin vs 11.6%. KMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.86. KMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

KMI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
KMIUndervalued (+51.0%)

Margin of Safety

+51.0%

Fair Value

$64.12

Current Price

$33.98

$30.14 discount

UndervaluedFair: $64.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

KMI5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

Market CapQuality
$75.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
49.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 49.3% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.58B8/10

Generating 1.6B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

KMI1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : KMI

The strongest argument for KMI centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.0% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 13.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : KMI

The primary concerns for KMI are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while KMI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

KMI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

KMI is growing revenue faster at 13.1% — sustainability is the question.

KMI generates stronger free cash flow (1.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KMI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 18.0% margins and 13.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Kinder Morgan Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?