WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsInteractive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 125% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $6.45B). IBKR leads profitability with a 16.1% profit margin vs 2.0%. IBKR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.35. IBKR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

IBKR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for IBKR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

IBKR6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
76.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 76.8%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$143.52B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

IBKR3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : IBKR

The strongest argument for IBKR centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.1% and operating margin at 76.8%. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : IBKR

The primary concerns for IBKR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while IBKR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IBKR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

IBKR is growing revenue faster at 16.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

IBKR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 16.1% margins and 16.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Interactive Brokers Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is a global automated electronic broker. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?