WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsCorning Incorporated (GLW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Corning Incorporated generates 13% more annual revenue ($16.32B vs $14.47B). GLW leads profitability with a 11.1% profit margin vs 2.0%. GLW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.80. GLW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

GLW

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.03
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GLW.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

GLW3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
138.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 138.9% YoY

Market CapQuality
$160.89B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Revenue surging 20.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

GLW3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.804/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
13.6x4/10

Trading at 13.6x book value

P/E RatioValuation
89.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : GLW

The strongest argument for GLW centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : GLW

The primary concerns for GLW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 89.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while GLW is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GLW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

GLW is growing revenue faster at 20.0% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GLW scores higher overall (62/100 vs 41/100) and 20.0% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Corning Incorporated

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Corning Incorporated is an American multinational technology company that specializes in specialty glass, ceramics, and related materials and technologies including advanced optics, primarily for industrial and scientific applications.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?