Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsGilead Sciences Inc (GILD)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$188.70
-0.92%
ENERGY · Cap: $53.58B
GILD
Gilead Sciences Inc
$131.33
-2.04%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $166.40B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Gilead Sciences Inc generates 103% more annual revenue ($29.44B vs $14.47B). GILD leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 2.0%. GILD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.38. GILD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
GILD
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+44.7%
Fair Value
$305.77
Current Price
$188.70
$117.07 discount
Margin of Safety
+43.2%
Fair Value
$236.08
Current Price
$131.33
$104.75 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Every $100 of equity generates 41 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Earnings expanding 23.4% YoY
Areas to Watch
ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
4.7% revenue growth
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : GILD
The strongest argument for GILD centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 37.4%. PEG of 0.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : GILD
The primary concerns for GILD are Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.
GILD generates stronger free cash flow (3.1B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
GILD scores higher overall (72/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Gilead Sciences Inc
HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is an American biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Foster City, California, that focuses on researching and developing antiviral drugs used in the treatment of HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and influenza, including Harvoni and Sovaldi.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?