WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsGlobus Medical (GMED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corp generates 106% more annual revenue ($6.07B vs $2.94B). GMED leads profitability with a 18.3% profit margin vs 17.7%. GMED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. GMED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9

GMED

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.88
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWSignificantly Overvalued (-544.4%)

Margin of Safety

-544.4%

Fair Value

$12.31

Current Price

$82.67

$70.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.31Overvalued
GMEDUndervalued (+51.9%)

Margin of Safety

+51.9%

Fair Value

$183.46

Current Price

$87.35

$96.11 discount

UndervaluedFair: $183.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

GMED4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.8810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.7%8/10

Revenue surging 25.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.144/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

GMED2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% earnings growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GMED

The strongest argument for GMED centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.3% and operating margin at 24.4%. Revenue growth of 25.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : GMED

The primary concerns for GMED are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EW profiles as a mature stock while GMED is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GMED carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

GMED is growing revenue faster at 25.7% — sustainability is the question.

EW generates stronger free cash flow (354M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GMED scores higher overall (74/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 18.3% margins and 25.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Globus Medical

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Globus Medical, Inc., a medical device company, develops and markets healthcare solutions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The company is headquartered in Audubon, Pennsylvania.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?