WallStSmart

Abbott Laboratories (ABT)vsGlobus Medical (GMED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Abbott Laboratories generates 1408% more annual revenue ($44.33B vs $2.94B). GMED leads profitability with a 18.3% profit margin vs 14.7%. ABT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. GMED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

ABT

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

GMED

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.88
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABTSignificantly Overvalued (-315.5%)

Margin of Safety

-315.5%

Fair Value

$25.23

Current Price

$104.83

$79.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $25.23Overvalued
GMEDUndervalued (+51.9%)

Margin of Safety

+51.9%

Fair Value

$183.46

Current Price

$87.35

$96.11 discount

UndervaluedFair: $183.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABT3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$180.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.63B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

GMED4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.8810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.7%8/10

Revenue surging 25.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ABT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

GMED2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% earnings growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABT

The strongest argument for ABT centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : GMED

The strongest argument for GMED centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.3% and operating margin at 24.4%. Revenue growth of 25.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ABT

The primary concerns for ABT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : GMED

The primary concerns for GMED are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABT profiles as a value stock while GMED is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GMED carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

GMED is growing revenue faster at 25.7% — sustainability is the question.

ABT generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GMED scores higher overall (74/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 18.3% margins and 25.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Abbott Laboratories

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Abbott Laboratories is an American multinational medical devices and health care company with headquarters in Abbott Park, Illinois, United States. The company was founded by Chicago physician Wallace Calvin Abbott in 1888 to formulate known drugs; today, it sells medical devices, diagnostics, branded generic medicines and nutritional products. It split off its research-based pharmaceuticals business into AbbVie in 2013.

Visit Website →

Globus Medical

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Globus Medical, Inc., a medical device company, develops and markets healthcare solutions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The company is headquartered in Audubon, Pennsylvania.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?