WallStSmart

Abbott Laboratories (ABT)vsEdwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Abbott Laboratories generates 631% more annual revenue ($44.33B vs $6.07B). EW leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 14.7%. ABT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. EW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

ABT

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

EW

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABTSignificantly Overvalued (-323.7%)

Margin of Safety

-323.7%

Fair Value

$25.30

Current Price

$105.46

$80.16 premium

UndervaluedFair: $25.30Overvalued
EWSignificantly Overvalued (-537.7%)

Margin of Safety

-537.7%

Fair Value

$12.44

Current Price

$82.50

$70.06 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABT3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$191.06B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.63B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

Areas to Watch

ABT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.184/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
46.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABT

The strongest argument for ABT centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ABT

The primary concerns for ABT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 46.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABT profiles as a value stock while EW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

EW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.3% — sustainability is the question.

ABT generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EW scores higher overall (53/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 17.7% margins and 13.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Abbott Laboratories

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Abbott Laboratories is an American multinational medical devices and health care company with headquarters in Abbott Park, Illinois, United States. The company was founded by Chicago physician Wallace Calvin Abbott in 1888 to formulate known drugs; today, it sells medical devices, diagnostics, branded generic medicines and nutritional products. It split off its research-based pharmaceuticals business into AbbVie in 2013.

Visit Website →

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?