WallStSmart

Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA)vsFerrovial SE (FER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 2009% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $467.37M). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 2.2%. ESOA trades at a lower P/E of 18.8x. ESOA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

ESOA

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.44

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.94

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ESOA3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.5%8/10

Revenue surging 25.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.1% YoY

FER0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

ESOA4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$210.10M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

2.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.863/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
8.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
58.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ESOA

The strongest argument for ESOA centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 25.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FER

FER has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : ESOA

The primary concerns for ESOA are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 2.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ESOA profiles as a growth stock while FER is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ESOA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

ESOA is growing revenue faster at 25.5% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ESOA scores higher overall (56/100 vs 38/100) and 25.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Services Of America Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Energy Services of America Corporation provides contracting services for utilities and energy-related companies in the United States. The company is headquartered in Huntington, West Virginia.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?