WallStSmart

Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA)vsFerrovial SE (FER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ferrovial SE generates 2083% more annual revenue ($9.63B vs $440.96M). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 2.1%. ESOA trades at a lower P/E of 27.1x. ESOA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

ESOA

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.44

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ESOA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
220.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 220.0% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.5%8/10

Revenue surging 21.5% year-over-year

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ESOA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$278.40M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

Operating margin of 1.1%

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ESOA

The strongest argument for ESOA centers on EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : ESOA

The primary concerns for ESOA are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ESOA profiles as a growth stock while FER is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ESOA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

ESOA is growing revenue faster at 21.5% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ESOA scores higher overall (52/100 vs 38/100) and 21.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Energy Services Of America Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Energy Services of America Corporation provides contracting services for utilities and energy-related companies in the United States. The company is headquartered in Huntington, West Virginia.

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?