WallStSmart

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)vsFederal Signal Corporation (FSS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Curtiss-Wright Corporation generates 47% more annual revenue ($3.61B vs $2.45B). CW leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 11.7%. FSS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.92. FSS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

CW

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.95

FSS

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.26

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
29.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 29.1% YoY

FSS3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.7%8/10

18.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

CW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
9.7x4/10

Trading at 9.7x book value

P/E RatioValuation
53.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-17.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

FSS3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
26.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CW

The strongest argument for CW centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FSS

The strongest argument for FSS centers on Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 18.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CW

The primary concerns for CW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 53.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FSS

The primary concerns for FSS are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CW profiles as a value stock while FSS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FSS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.23 — expect wider price swings.

FSS is growing revenue faster at 18.7% — sustainability is the question.

FSS generates stronger free cash flow (95M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FSS scores higher overall (64/100 vs 61/100) and 18.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Curtiss-Wright Corporation designs, manufactures and repairs precision components and engineering products and services primarily for the aerospace, defense, general industrial and power generation markets worldwide.

Federal Signal Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Federal Signal Corporation designs, manufactures, and supplies a suite of integrated products and solutions for municipal, government, industrial, and commercial customers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?