WallStSmart

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)vsRaytheon Technologies Corp (RTX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raytheon Technologies Corp generates 2433% more annual revenue ($88.60B vs $3.50B). CW leads profitability with a 13.8% profit margin vs 7.6%. CW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.00. CW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CW

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9

RTX

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWSignificantly Overvalued (-28.9%)

Margin of Safety

-28.9%

Fair Value

$491.88

Current Price

$702.25

$210.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $491.88Overvalued
RTXSignificantly Overvalued (-95.4%)

Margin of Safety

-95.4%

Fair Value

$99.80

Current Price

$195.00

$95.20 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

RTX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$261.12B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.19B8/10

Generating 3.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CW3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
10.2x4/10

Trading at 10.2x book value

P/E RatioValuation
54.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

RTX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.782/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CW

The strongest argument for CW centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 12.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CW

The primary concerns for CW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 54.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

CW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

RTX generates stronger free cash flow (3.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AEROSPACE & DEFENSE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CW scores higher overall (61/100 vs 55/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Curtiss-Wright Corporation designs, manufactures and repairs precision components and engineering products and services primarily for the aerospace, defense, general industrial and power generation markets worldwide.

Raytheon Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?