WallStSmart

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 1983% more annual revenue ($75.11B vs $3.61B). CW leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 6.4%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.12. CW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CW

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.95

LMT

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CW.

LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-49.9%)

Margin of Safety

-49.9%

Fair Value

$340.92

Current Price

$503.67

$162.75 premium

UndervaluedFair: $340.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
29.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 29.1% YoY

LMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
64.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 64 in profit

Market CapQuality
$123.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
10.7x4/10

Trading at 10.7x book value

P/E RatioValuation
55.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-17.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
15.5x4/10

Trading at 15.5x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.4%3/10

6.4% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CW

The strongest argument for CW centers on EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap. PEG of 1.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CW

The primary concerns for CW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 55.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.

CW is growing revenue faster at 13.4% — sustainability is the question.

CW generates stronger free cash flow (-17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AEROSPACE & DEFENSE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CW scores higher overall (61/100 vs 55/100) and 13.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Curtiss-Wright Corporation designs, manufactures and repairs precision components and engineering products and services primarily for the aerospace, defense, general industrial and power generation markets worldwide.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?