WallStSmart

Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 37% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $2.75B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs -2.5%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

CRCL

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 10.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.05

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRCL.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRCL3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
76.9%10/10

Revenue surging 76.9% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
880.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 880.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

CRCL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.352/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.8%2/10

ROE of -2.8% — below average capital efficiency

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRCL

The strongest argument for CRCL centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 76.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRCL

The primary concerns for CRCL are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRCL profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

CRCL generates stronger free cash flow (233M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 42/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Circle Internet Group, Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Circle Internet Group, Inc. is a platform, network, and market infrastructure for stablecoin and blockchain applications. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?