WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsViking Holdings Ltd (VIK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 496% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $6.50B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 17.6%. CNQ trades at a lower P/E of 11.8x. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

VIK

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.16
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+55.1%)

Margin of Safety

+55.1%

Fair Value

$90.53

Current Price

$46.92

$43.61 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.53Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VIK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
371.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 371.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$92.88B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

VIK4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
254.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 255 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
226.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 226.6% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
20.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.8%8/10

Revenue surging 27.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CNQ2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VIK3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
33.7x2/10

Trading at 33.7x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.162/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.

Bull Case : VIK

The strongest argument for VIK centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 20.9%. Revenue growth of 27.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : VIK

The primary concerns for VIK are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a value stock while VIK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VIK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.57 — expect wider price swings.

VIK is growing revenue faster at 27.8% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (856M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 66/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Viking Holdings Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · TRAVEL SERVICES · USA

Viking Holdings Ltd engages in the passenger shipping and other forms of passenger transport in North America, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?