WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsKosmos Energy Ltd (KOS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 2720% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $1.37B). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs -59.5%. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CNQ

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

KOS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 2.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: -0.41
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+45.4%)

Margin of Safety

+45.4%

Fair Value

$83.74

Current Price

$45.70

$38.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $83.74Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KOS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Market CapQuality
$98.47B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
25.1%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%

KOS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.7%8/10

Revenue surging 27.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CNQ3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-45.3%2/10

Earnings declined 45.3%

KOS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.73B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-158.2%2/10

ROE of -158.2% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-50.0%2/10

Earnings declined 50.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.

Bull Case : KOS

The strongest argument for KOS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 27.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : KOS

The primary concerns for KOS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 5.80 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a declining stock while KOS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

KOS is growing revenue faster at 27.7% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (856M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 34/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Kosmos Energy Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Kosmos Energy Ltd., an independent deepwater oil and gas exploration and production company, focuses on the Atlantic margins. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?