WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsCalifornia Resources Corp (CRC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 1015% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $3.46B). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs -13.4%. CRC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.28. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CNQ

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

CRC

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.80
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+45.4%)

Margin of Safety

+45.4%

Fair Value

$83.74

Current Price

$45.70

$38.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $83.74Overvalued
CRCSignificantly Overvalued (-46.1%)

Margin of Safety

-46.1%

Fair Value

$38.85

Current Price

$58.34

$19.49 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.85Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Market CapQuality
$98.47B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
25.1%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%

CRC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CNQ3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-45.3%2/10

Earnings declined 45.3%

CRC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.804/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-15.9%2/10

ROE of -15.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-61.5%2/10

Earnings declined 61.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.

Bull Case : CRC

The strongest argument for CRC centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CRC

The primary concerns for CRC are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a declining stock while CRC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

CRC is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (856M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

California Resources Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

California Resources Corporation is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company in the state of California. The company is headquartered in Santa Clarita, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?