WallStSmart

Clean Harbors Inc (CLH)vsWaste Management Inc (WM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waste Management Inc generates 318% more annual revenue ($25.20B vs $6.03B). WM leads profitability with a 10.7% profit margin vs 6.5%. CLH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.27. WM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

CLH

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.11

WM

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLHSignificantly Overvalued (-158.0%)

Margin of Safety

-158.0%

Fair Value

$106.43

Current Price

$288.29

$181.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $106.43Overvalued
WMUndervalued (+21.4%)

Margin of Safety

+21.4%

Fair Value

$298.55

Current Price

$224.85

$73.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $298.55Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLH1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2710/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WM4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$90.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
29.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
20.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

CLH4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
4.9%4/10

4.9% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.5%3/10

6.5% margin — thin

WM3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.1x4/10

Trading at 9.1x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLH

The strongest argument for CLH centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.27 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WM

The strongest argument for WM centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CLH

The primary concerns for CLH are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WM

The primary concerns for WM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLH carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.

WM is growing revenue faster at 7.1% — sustainability is the question.

WM generates stronger free cash flow (810M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor WASTE MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WM scores higher overall (64/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Clean Harbors Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Clean Harbors, Inc. provides environmental and industrial services in North America. The company is headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts.

Waste Management Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Waste Management, Inc. is an American waste management, comprehensive waste, and environmental services company in North America. Founded in 1968, the company is headquartered 800 Capitol in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?