WallStSmart

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc generates 5339% more annual revenue ($18.90B vs $347.57M). CLF leads profitability with a -6.4% profit margin vs -20.5%. CLF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CLF

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.13

MP

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLFUndervalued (+66.5%)

Margin of Safety

+66.5%

Fair Value

$37.24

Current Price

$13.53

$23.71 discount

UndervaluedFair: $37.24Overvalued
MPSignificantly Overvalued (-55.4%)

Margin of Safety

-55.4%

Fair Value

$37.03

Current Price

$65.45

$28.42 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.03Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
118.6%10/10

Revenue surging 118.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CLF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.333/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-20.9%2/10

ROE of -20.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-99.4%2/10

Earnings declined 99.4%

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-79.28M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLF

The strongest argument for CLF centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 118.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CLF

The primary concerns for CLF are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLF profiles as a turnaround stock while MP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLF carries more volatility with a beta of 2.09 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 118.6% — sustainability is the question.

MP generates stronger free cash flow (-79M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CLF scores higher overall (49/100 vs 28/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is an independent iron ore mining company in the United States, Canada and internationally. The company is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Visit Website →

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?