WallStSmart

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF)vsArcelorMittal SA ADR (MT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ArcelorMittal SA ADR generates 230% more annual revenue ($61.35B vs $18.61B). MT leads profitability with a 5.1% profit margin vs -7.9%. CLF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.43. MT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CLF

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.13

MT

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 3.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLF.

MTUndervalued (+65.3%)

Margin of Safety

+65.3%

Fair Value

$192.35

Current Price

$52.88

$139.47 discount

UndervaluedFair: $192.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CLF2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MT5 strengths · Avg: 8.4/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.668/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
12.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.8%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.8% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.75B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CLF4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.193/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.6%2/10

ROE of -21.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.3%2/10

Revenue declined 0.3%

MT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.0%3/10

ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.1%3/10

5.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
-5.1%1/10

Operating margin of -5.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CLF

The strongest argument for CLF centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MT

The strongest argument for MT centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CLF

The primary concerns for CLF are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MT

The primary concerns for MT are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CLF profiles as a turnaround stock while MT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLF carries more volatility with a beta of 1.87 — expect wider price swings.

MT is growing revenue faster at 1.7% — sustainability is the question.

MT generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MT scores higher overall (62/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is an independent iron ore mining company in the United States, Canada and internationally. The company is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Visit Website →

ArcelorMittal SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · STEEL · USA

ArcelorMittal owns and operates steelmaking and mining facilities in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Africa. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?