WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsEstee Lauder Companies Inc (EL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 39% more annual revenue ($20.38B vs $14.67B). CL leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs -121.0%. EL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.83. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

EL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLSignificantly Overvalued (-279.8%)

Margin of Safety

-279.8%

Fair Value

$22.51

Current Price

$87.52

$65.01 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.51Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
49.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 50 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
110.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 110.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$72.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.28B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

EL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.02B8/10

Generating 1.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.482/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
1250.3x2/10

Trading at 1250.3x book value

EL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.834/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.3%2/10

ROE of -4.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bull Case : EL

The strongest argument for EL centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : EL

The primary concerns for EL are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CL profiles as a value stock while EL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

EL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

CL is growing revenue faster at 5.8% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (56/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products, based in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company owns a diverse portfolio of brands, distributed internationally through both digital commerce and retail channels.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?