WallStSmart

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Universal Health Services Inc generates 37% more annual revenue ($17.76B vs $12.93B). CINF leads profitability with a 21.3% profit margin vs 8.6%. UHS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.17. CINF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B+).

CINF

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.59

UHS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CINF.

UHSUndervalued (+40.6%)

Margin of Safety

+40.6%

Fair Value

$389.40

Current Price

$169.96

$219.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $389.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CINF4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
67.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 67.3% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
21.3%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UHS3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

CINF2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.194/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.594/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CINF

The strongest argument for CINF centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.3% and operating margin at 11.8%. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CINF

The primary concerns for CINF are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CINF profiles as a mature stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UHS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

CINF is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

CINF generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CINF scores higher overall (75/100 vs 72/100), backed by strong 21.3% margins and 11.6% revenue growth. UHS offers better value entry with a 40.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cincinnati Financial Corporation

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

Cincinnati Financial Corporation offers property and casualty insurance, its main business, through The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company and The Cincinnati Casualty Company.

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?