WallStSmart

ChargePoint Holdings Inc (CHPT)vsUlta Beauty Inc (ULTA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ulta Beauty Inc generates 2990% more annual revenue ($12.71B vs $411.22M). ULTA leads profitability with a 9.4% profit margin vs -53.5%. ULTA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

CHPT

Avoid

26

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -3.96

ULTA

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.41
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CHPTUndervalued (+78.8%)

Margin of Safety

+78.8%

Fair Value

$28.77

Current Price

$7.22

$21.55 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.77Overvalued
ULTASignificantly Overvalued (-23.0%)

Margin of Safety

-23.0%

Fair Value

$555.27

Current Price

$467.07

$88.20 premium

UndervaluedFair: $555.27Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CHPT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-27.3810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ULTA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
46.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 46 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
17.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CHPT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$215.21M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-277.4%2/10

ROE of -277.4% — below average capital efficiency

ULTA2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.624/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CHPT

The strongest argument for CHPT centers on Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : ULTA

The strongest argument for ULTA centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CHPT

The primary concerns for CHPT are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : ULTA

The primary concerns for ULTA are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CHPT profiles as a turnaround stock while ULTA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CHPT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.69 — expect wider price swings.

ULTA is growing revenue faster at 11.1% — sustainability is the question.

ULTA generates stronger free cash flow (204M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ULTA scores higher overall (63/100 vs 26/100) and 11.1% revenue growth. CHPT offers better value entry with a 78.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ChargePoint Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · SPECIALTY RETAIL · USA

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. provides electric vehicle (EV) charging networks and charging solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Campbell, California.

Visit Website →

Ulta Beauty Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · SPECIALTY RETAIL · USA

Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc., is an American chain of beauty stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries cosmetics and skincare brands, men's and women's fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?