Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (CCO)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)
CCO
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc
$2.40
-0.41%
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · Cap: $1.23B
WPP
WPP PLC ADR
$17.70
-4.74%
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · Cap: $4.11B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
WPP PLC ADR generates 724% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $1.64B). WPP leads profitability with a -1.6% profit margin vs -5.5%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. CCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).
CCO
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
WPP
Avoid34
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+36.3%
Fair Value
$3.72
Current Price
$2.40
$1.32 discount
Margin of Safety
+68.9%
Fair Value
$58.87
Current Price
$17.70
$41.17 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Generating 1.7B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 75.8%
Operating margin of 2.2%
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 8.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CCO
The strongest argument for CCO centers on Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 11.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WPP
The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : CCO
The primary concerns for CCO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : WPP
The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.96 — expect wider price swings.
CCO is growing revenue faster at 11.9% — sustainability is the question.
WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
CCO scores higher overall (41/100 vs 34/100) and 11.9% revenue growth. WPP offers better value entry with a 68.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. owns, operates and sells advertising displays in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.
WPP PLC ADR
COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA
WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ADVERTISING AGENCIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?