WallStSmart

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (CCO)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 745% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $1.60B). CCO leads profitability with a 1.2% profit margin vs -1.6%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. CCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

CCO

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCO1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
25.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.1%

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CCO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.19B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.2%3/10

1.2% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
16.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCO

The strongest argument for CCO centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CCO

The primary concerns for CCO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CCO profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CCO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.33 — expect wider price swings.

CCO is growing revenue faster at 8.2% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CCO scores higher overall (43/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. owns, operates and sells advertising displays in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?