WallStSmart

Citigroup Inc. (C)vsLazard Ltd (LAZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Citigroup Inc. generates 2441% more annual revenue ($78.73B vs $3.10B). C leads profitability with a 20.4% profit margin vs 7.6%. C appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.71. C earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 82/100 (A-).

C

Exceptional Buy

82

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0

LAZ

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.87

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

C6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$223.88B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
34.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
56.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 56.1% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
20.4%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.718/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

LAZ2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
28.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

C1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.7%3/10

ROE of 7.7% — below average capital efficiency

LAZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.874/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-43.3%2/10

Earnings declined 43.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : C

The strongest argument for C centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.4% and operating margin at 34.1%. Revenue growth of 16.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LAZ

The strongest argument for LAZ centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : C

The primary concerns for C are Return on Equity.

Bear Case : LAZ

The primary concerns for LAZ are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

C profiles as a growth stock while LAZ is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LAZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

C is growing revenue faster at 16.9% — sustainability is the question.

C generates stronger free cash flow (2.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

C scores higher overall (82/100 vs 57/100), backed by strong 20.4% margins and 16.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Citigroup Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Citigroup Inc. is an American multinational investment bank and financial services corporation headquartered in New York City. The company was formed by the merger of banking giant Citicorp and financial conglomerate Travelers Group in 1998; Travelers was subsequently spun off from the company in 2002. Citigroup owns Citicorp, the holding company for Citibank, as well as several international subsidiaries. Citigroup is incorporated in Delaware.

Lazard Ltd

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Lazard Ltd, is a financial advisory and asset management firm in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Central and South America. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?