WallStSmart

Banco Macro SA B ADR (BMA)vsU.S. Bancorp (USB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Banco Macro SA B ADR generates 12511% more annual revenue ($3.45T vs $27.32B). USB leads profitability with a 29.9% profit margin vs 8.4%. BMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.47. USB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).

BMA

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.71

USB

Strong Buy

77

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.36

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BMA6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4710/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$575.25B10/10

Generating 575.3B in free cash flow

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
26.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.4%8/10

Revenue surging 21.4% year-over-year

USB6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.7%

Market CapQuality
$97.91B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
29.9%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

BMA3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.712/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

USB3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.884/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.423/10

Elevated debt levels

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.362/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BMA

The strongest argument for BMA centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 21.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.47 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : USB

The strongest argument for USB centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.9% and operating margin at 39.7%. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BMA

The primary concerns for BMA are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : USB

The primary concerns for USB are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BMA profiles as a growth stock while USB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

USB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

BMA is growing revenue faster at 21.4% — sustainability is the question.

BMA generates stronger free cash flow (575.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

USB scores higher overall (77/100 vs 70/100), backed by strong 29.9% margins and 10.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Banco Macro SA B ADR

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

Banco Macro SA offers various banking products and services to retail and corporate clients in Argentina. The company is headquartered in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

U.S. Bancorp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

U.S. Bancorp is an American bank holding company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and incorporated in Delaware. The company provides banking, investment, mortgage, trust, and payment services products to individuals, businesses, governmental entities, and other financial institutions.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?