WallStSmart

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP generates 2549% more annual revenue ($23.10B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 1.9%. BIP trades at a lower P/E of 39.3x. BIP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

BIP

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BIP.

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BIP3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
107.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.3% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
26.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.8%8/10

15.8% revenue growth

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BIP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
7.7%3/10

ROE of 7.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BIP

The strongest argument for BIP centers on EPS Growth, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BIP

The primary concerns for BIP are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 11.48 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BIP profiles as a growth stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

BIP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.09 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

BIP generates stronger free cash flow (336M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BIP scores higher overall (64/100 vs 40/100) and 15.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP owns and operates utilities, transportation, midstream and data companies in North and South America, Europe and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?