WallStSmart

The AES Corporation (AES)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

The AES Corporation generates 1303% more annual revenue ($12.23B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 7.4%. AES trades at a lower P/E of 11.0x. AES earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

AES

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.44

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AESUndervalued (+9.3%)

Margin of Safety

+9.3%

Fair Value

$18.13

Current Price

$14.45

$3.68 discount

UndervaluedFair: $18.13Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AES2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AES4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AES

The strongest argument for AES centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AES

The primary concerns for AES are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 7.98 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AES profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AES carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AES scores higher overall (55/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

The AES Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

The AES Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that generates and distributes electrical power. AES is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?