WallStSmart

Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp generates 179% more annual revenue ($2.43B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 7.4%. AQN trades at a lower P/E of 22.8x. AQN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

AQN

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.32

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AQNUndervalued (+71.3%)

Margin of Safety

+71.3%

Fair Value

$22.99

Current Price

$6.16

$16.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $22.99Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AQN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AQN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
2.6%3/10

ROE of 2.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.393/10

Elevated debt levels

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AQN

The strongest argument for AQN centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AQN

The primary concerns for AQN are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AQN profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AQN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AQN scores higher overall (46/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. The company is headquartered in Oakville, Canada.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?