WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsCF Industries Holdings Inc (CF)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 629% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $7.41B). CF leads profitability with a 23.7% profit margin vs 19.0%. CF appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.25. CF earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).

BHP

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24

CF

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

CFUndervalued (+49.7%)

Margin of Safety

+49.7%

Fair Value

$217.58

Current Price

$117.54

$100.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $217.58Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$230.71B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

CF6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
32.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
33.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.6%

EPS GrowthGrowth
115.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 115.1% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
23.7%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.4%8/10

19.4% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

CF1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.252/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CF

The strongest argument for CF centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.7% and operating margin at 33.6%. Revenue growth of 19.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : CF

The primary concerns for CF are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a mature stock while CF is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

BHP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.

CF is growing revenue faster at 19.4% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CF scores higher overall (75/100 vs 62/100), backed by strong 23.7% margins and 19.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

CF Industries Holdings Inc

BASIC MATERIALS · AGRICULTURAL INPUTS · USA

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is a North American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, based in Deerfield, Illinois.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?