WallStSmart

Saul Centers Inc (BFS)vsFederal Realty Investment Trust (FRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust generates 343% more annual revenue ($1.31B vs $296.25M). FRT leads profitability with a 38.6% profit margin vs 12.4%. FRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.65. FRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

BFS

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 3.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.19

FRT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.54
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BFS.

FRTUndervalued (+35.5%)

Margin of Safety

+35.5%

Fair Value

$165.94

Current Price

$122.56

$43.38 discount

UndervaluedFair: $165.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BFS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.5%

FRT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
38.6%10/10

Keeps 39 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
34.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
152.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 152.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

BFS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.22B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
44.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

FRT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.493/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.542/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BFS

The strongest argument for BFS centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : FRT

The strongest argument for FRT centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 38.6% and operating margin at 34.1%. Revenue growth of 10.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BFS

The primary concerns for BFS are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : FRT

The primary concerns for FRT are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BFS profiles as a value stock while FRT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FRT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

FRT is growing revenue faster at 10.3% — sustainability is the question.

FRT generates stronger free cash flow (121M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FRT scores higher overall (65/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 38.6% margins and 10.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Saul Centers Inc

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RETAIL · USA

Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-managed, self-managed capital REIT based in Bethesda, Maryland, currently operating and managing a real estate portfolio of 60 properties that includes (a) 50 community and neighborhood shopping centers and seven mixed-use properties with approximately 9.

Federal Realty Investment Trust

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RETAIL · USA

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?