WallStSmart

Saul Centers Inc (BFS)vsFederal Realty Investment Trust (FRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust generates 353% more annual revenue ($1.28B vs $282.62M). FRT leads profitability with a 32.1% profit margin vs 13.8%. FRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.65. FRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

BFS

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

FRT

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BFSSignificantly Overvalued (-341.7%)

Margin of Safety

-341.7%

Fair Value

$7.75

Current Price

$32.71

$24.96 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.75Overvalued
FRTUndervalued (+51.2%)

Margin of Safety

+51.2%

Fair Value

$219.02

Current Price

$103.27

$115.75 discount

UndervaluedFair: $219.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BFS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
43.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%

FRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
32.1%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
34.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
98.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 98.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BFS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$1.03B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
44.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-33.9%2/10

Earnings declined 33.9%

FRT2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.592/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BFS

The strongest argument for BFS centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : FRT

The strongest argument for FRT centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 32.1% and operating margin at 34.5%.

Bear Case : BFS

The primary concerns for BFS are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : FRT

The primary concerns for FRT are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BFS profiles as a value stock while FRT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BFS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.03 — expect wider price swings.

FRT is growing revenue faster at 7.5% — sustainability is the question.

FRT generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FRT scores higher overall (66/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 32.1% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Saul Centers Inc

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RETAIL · USA

Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-managed, self-managed capital REIT based in Bethesda, Maryland, currently operating and managing a real estate portfolio of 60 properties that includes (a) 50 community and neighborhood shopping centers and seven mixed-use properties with approximately 9.

Federal Realty Investment Trust

REAL ESTATE · REIT - RETAIL · USA

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?