WallStSmart

Bloom Energy Corp (BE)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 15903% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $2.02B). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -4.4%. XOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.02. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

BE

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.52

XOM

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BE.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-275.9%)

Margin of Safety

-275.9%

Fair Value

$45.49

Current Price

$170.99

$125.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.9%10/10

Revenue surging 35.9% year-over-year

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$680.27B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.272/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
48.5x2/10

Trading at 48.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.7%2/10

ROE of -12.7% — below average capital efficiency

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-130.0%2/10

Revenue declined 130.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BE

The strongest argument for BE centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 35.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : BE

The primary concerns for BE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BE profiles as a hypergrowth stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BE carries more volatility with a beta of 3.18 — expect wider price swings.

BE is growing revenue faster at 35.9% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (44/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bloom Energy Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures and sells solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States, Japan, China, India, and the Republic of Korea. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?