WallStSmart

Bloom Energy Corp (BE)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 405% more annual revenue ($10.23B vs $2.02B). VRT leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -4.4%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.87. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

BE

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.52

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BE.

VRTSignificantly Overvalued (-55.3%)

Margin of Safety

-55.3%

Fair Value

$160.06

Current Price

$255.88

$95.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $160.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.9%10/10

Revenue surging 35.9% year-over-year

VRT5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
41.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 42 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
199.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 199.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$101.29B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Revenue surging 22.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

BE4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.462/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
54.6x2/10

Trading at 54.6x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.7%2/10

ROE of -12.7% — below average capital efficiency

VRT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.874/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
77.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
24.8x2/10

Trading at 24.8x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BE

The strongest argument for BE centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 35.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 22.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BE

The primary concerns for BE are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 77.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BE profiles as a hypergrowth stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

BE carries more volatility with a beta of 3.18 — expect wider price swings.

BE is growing revenue faster at 35.9% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (912M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 35/100) and 22.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bloom Energy Corp

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures and sells solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States, Japan, China, India, and the Republic of Korea. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?