WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsJumia Technologies AG (JMIA)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 498498% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $209.58M). BABA leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -27.5%. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.02

JMIA

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -23.03
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+65.0%)

Margin of Safety

+65.0%

Fair Value

$435.28

Current Price

$109.45

$325.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $435.28Overvalued
JMIASignificantly Overvalued (-38.1%)

Margin of Safety

-38.1%

Fair Value

$7.09

Current Price

$5.49

$1.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.09Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$249.37B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

JMIA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

BABA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-79.4%2/10

Earnings declined 79.4%

JMIA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$749.64M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Price/BookValuation
549.0x2/10

Trading at 549.0x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-478.5%2/10

ROE of -478.5% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : JMIA

Revenue growth of 13.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : JMIA

The primary concerns for JMIA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 15.68 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while JMIA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

JMIA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.53 — expect wider price swings.

JMIA is growing revenue faster at 13.9% — sustainability is the question.

JMIA generates stronger free cash flow (-12M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (55/100 vs 25/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

Jumia Technologies AG

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Jumia Technologies AG operates an e-commerce platform in Africa, Portugal, Germany and the United Arab Emirates. The company is headquartered in Berlin, Germany.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?