WallStSmart

Ardmore Shpng (ASC)vsDanaos Corporation (DAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Danaos Corporation generates 222% more annual revenue ($1.04B vs $324.12M). DAC leads profitability with a 49.8% profit margin vs 18.0%. DAC trades at a lower P/E of 4.4x. DAC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

ASC

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52

DAC

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASCUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$21.72

Current Price

$16.44

$5.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $21.72Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ASC6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
316.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 316.4% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
12.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
29.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.1%

DAC6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
4.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
49.8%10/10

Keeps 50 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
49.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 49.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

ASC2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$651.62M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

DAC2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ASC

The strongest argument for ASC centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.0% and operating margin at 29.1%. Revenue growth of 18.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : DAC

The strongest argument for DAC centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 49.8% and operating margin at 49.3%. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ASC

The primary concerns for ASC are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : DAC

The primary concerns for DAC are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ASC profiles as a growth stock while DAC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.90 — expect wider price swings.

ASC is growing revenue faster at 18.8% — sustainability is the question.

ASC generates stronger free cash flow (28M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DAC scores higher overall (73/100 vs 64/100), backed by strong 49.8% margins. ASC offers better value entry with a 37.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ardmore Shpng

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Ardmore Shipping Corporation is engaged in the global shipping of chemicals and petroleum products. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

Danaos Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Danaos Corporation owns and operates container ships in Australia, Asia, Europe and the United States. The company is headquartered in Piraeus, Greece.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?