WallStSmart

Ardmore Shpng (ASC)vsZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd generates 2126% more annual revenue ($6.90B vs $310.20M). ASC leads profitability with a 13.2% profit margin vs 6.9%. ZIM trades at a lower P/E of 6.6x. ASC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

ASC

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52

ZIM

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASCUndervalued (+67.0%)

Margin of Safety

+67.0%

Fair Value

$41.18

Current Price

$15.90

$25.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $41.18Overvalued
ZIMUndervalued (+21.9%)

Margin of Safety

+21.9%

Fair Value

$27.06

Current Price

$26.44

$0.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $27.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ASC5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
80.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.7% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

ZIM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ASC4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$596.72M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZIM4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-31.5%2/10

Revenue declined 31.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.2%2/10

Earnings declined 93.2%

Operating MarginProfitability
-2.0%1/10

Operating margin of -2.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ASC

The strongest argument for ASC centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : ZIM

The strongest argument for ZIM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : ASC

The primary concerns for ASC are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ZIM

The primary concerns for ZIM are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ZIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

ASC is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

ZIM generates stronger free cash flow (246M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MARINE SHIPPING industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ASC scores higher overall (61/100 vs 45/100). ZIM offers better value entry with a 21.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ardmore Shpng

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Ardmore Shipping Corporation is engaged in the global shipping of chemicals and petroleum products. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Haifa, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?