Danaos Corporation (DAC)vsMatson Inc (MATX)
DAC
Danaos Corporation
$151.48
+0.53%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $2.66B
MATX
Matson Inc
$224.81
+0.22%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $6.71B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Matson Inc generates 228% more annual revenue ($3.46B vs $1.06B). DAC leads profitability with a 51.3% profit margin vs 13.4%. DAC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.12. DAC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).
DAC
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
MATX
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 51 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 48.4%
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
16.7% revenue growth
Earnings expanding 46.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
4.7% revenue growth
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Weak financial health signals
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DAC
The strongest argument for DAC centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.3% and operating margin at 48.4%. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MATX
The strongest argument for MATX centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 16.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : DAC
The primary concerns for DAC are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : MATX
The primary concerns for MATX are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DAC profiles as a value stock while MATX is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
MATX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
MATX is growing revenue faster at 16.7% — sustainability is the question.
DAC generates stronger free cash flow (20M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
DAC scores higher overall (71/100 vs 69/100), backed by strong 51.3% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Danaos Corporation
INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA
Danaos Corporation owns and operates container ships in Australia, Asia, Europe and the United States. The company is headquartered in Piraeus, Greece.
Matson Inc
INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA
Matson, Inc. provides logistics and shipping services. The company is headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MARINE SHIPPING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?