WallStSmart

Amphenol Corporation (APH)vsCTS Corporation (CTS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Amphenol Corporation generates 4166% more annual revenue ($23.09B vs $541.32M). APH leads profitability with a 18.5% profit margin vs 12.1%. CTS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.20. APH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

APH

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

CTS

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

APHUndervalued (+6.8%)

Margin of Safety

+6.8%

Fair Value

$156.78

Current Price

$128.73

$28.05 discount

UndervaluedFair: $156.78Overvalued
CTSUndervalued (+45.7%)

Margin of Safety

+45.7%

Fair Value

$105.30

Current Price

$50.34

$54.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $105.30Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

APH6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
49.1%10/10

Revenue surging 49.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
57.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.6% YoY

Market CapQuality
$157.29B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.47B8/10

Generating 1.5B in free cash flow

CTS2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
76.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 76.3% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

APH2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.8x4/10

Trading at 11.8x book value

CTS1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.45B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : APH

The strongest argument for APH centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 27.5%. Revenue growth of 49.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CTS

The strongest argument for CTS centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : APH

The primary concerns for APH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CTS

The primary concerns for CTS are Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

APH profiles as a growth stock while CTS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

APH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

APH is growing revenue faster at 49.1% — sustainability is the question.

APH generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

APH scores higher overall (76/100 vs 65/100), backed by strong 18.5% margins and 49.1% revenue growth. CTS offers better value entry with a 45.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Amphenol Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Amphenol Corporation is a major producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.

CTS Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

CTS Corporation manufactures and sells sensors, actuators, and connectivity components in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Lisle, Illinois.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?