WallStSmart

Amphenol Corporation (APH)vsCelestica Inc. (CLS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Amphenol Corporation generates 88% more annual revenue ($25.90B vs $13.79B). APH leads profitability with a 17.2% profit margin vs 7.0%. CLS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.00. APH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

APH

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 9.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

CLS

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

APHUndervalued (+53.5%)

Margin of Safety

+53.5%

Fair Value

$313.95

Current Price

$141.03

$172.92 discount

UndervaluedFair: $313.95Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CLS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

APH5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
58.4%10/10

Revenue surging 58.4% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$174.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
27.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
24.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 24.1% YoY

CLS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
52.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 52 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.8%10/10

Revenue surging 52.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

APH2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
12.9x4/10

Trading at 12.9x book value

P/E RatioValuation
40.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

CLS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
50.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
23.1x2/10

Trading at 23.1x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : APH

The strongest argument for APH centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.2% and operating margin at 27.3%. Revenue growth of 58.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CLS

The strongest argument for CLS centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 52.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : APH

The primary concerns for APH are Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 40.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : CLS

The primary concerns for CLS are Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 50.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

APH profiles as a growth stock while CLS is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CLS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.35 — expect wider price swings.

APH is growing revenue faster at 58.4% — sustainability is the question.

APH generates stronger free cash flow (830M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

APH scores higher overall (74/100 vs 68/100), backed by strong 17.2% margins and 58.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Amphenol Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Amphenol Corporation is a major producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.

Celestica Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Celestica Inc. provides hardware platforms and supply chain solutions in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?