WallStSmart

CTS Corporation (CTS)vsJabil Circuit Inc (JBL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Jabil Circuit Inc generates 5935% more annual revenue ($32.67B vs $541.32M). CTS leads profitability with a 12.1% profit margin vs 2.5%. JBL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.82. JBL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

CTS

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0

JBL

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 9.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.35
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTSUndervalued (+45.7%)

Margin of Safety

+45.7%

Fair Value

$105.30

Current Price

$50.34

$54.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $105.30Overvalued
JBLUndervalued (+24.9%)

Margin of Safety

+24.9%

Fair Value

$347.72

Current Price

$283.24

$64.48 discount

UndervaluedFair: $347.72Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTS2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
76.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 76.3% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

JBL4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
59.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 60 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
96.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 96.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.828/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.1%8/10

Revenue surging 23.1% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CTS1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.45B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

JBL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
2.5%3/10

2.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTS

The strongest argument for CTS centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : JBL

The strongest argument for JBL centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 23.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CTS

The primary concerns for CTS are Market Cap.

Bear Case : JBL

The primary concerns for JBL are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 2.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTS profiles as a value stock while JBL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

JBL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

JBL is growing revenue faster at 23.1% — sustainability is the question.

JBL generates stronger free cash flow (316M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

JBL scores higher overall (70/100 vs 65/100) and 23.1% revenue growth. CTS offers better value entry with a 45.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CTS Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

CTS Corporation manufactures and sells sensors, actuators, and connectivity components in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Lisle, Illinois.

Jabil Circuit Inc

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Jabil Inc. provides global manufacturing solutions and services. The company is headquartered in Saint Petersburg, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?